...I have a project...what hardware do I need?
Ask the Unitronics staff for recommendations regarding controller type, I/O configuration, and communication methods.
122 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 1,006 views
-
- 4 replies
- 997 views
-
- 1 reply
- 981 views
-
- 2 replies
- 970 views
-
- 3 replies
- 955 views
-
- 5 replies
- 942 views
-
- 5 replies
- 940 views
-
- 5 replies
- 937 views
-
- 1 reply
- 930 views
-
- 1 reply
- 913 views
-
- 2 replies
- 907 views
-
- 0 replies
- 886 views
-
- 2 replies
- 880 views
-
- 0 replies
- 875 views
-
- 0 replies
- 870 views
-
- 3 replies
- 862 views
-
- 2 replies
- 853 views
-
- 2 replies
- 852 views
-
- 5 replies
- 846 views
-
- 3 replies
- 845 views
-
- 1 reply
- 844 views
-
- 1 reply
- 824 views
-
- 2 replies
- 791 views
-
- 0 replies
- 787 views
-
- 1 reply
- 720 views
-
Member Statistics
-
Topics
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)
-
Posts
-
Thanks Joe, I didn't know it was token. I think I've always been literally going on this illustration: My brain always puzzled on this along the lines of "how do all the networked recipients do this at the same time without conflicts?" Makes much more sense now. And yes, I'm a dumbo for not picking it in the first place. cheers, Aus -
By Joe Tauser · Posted
UniCAN is a token passing network. This doesn't happen. Joe T. -
By Joe Tauser · Posted
Good catch. My only excuse is I was editing Paul's programs and re-posting them, and he was just starting from the example. I didn't delete the compare block. These days I don't use the CANbus status register in my logic - it is more of an informational tool. Like this error counter: I've found UniCAN to be extremely reliable if you don't overthink it. Joe T. -
It seems to be regular, but I dont panic, anymore. But I wanted to tell I am using Unilogic 1.29.111 -
Check Alive, of course. How I didn't think of it Thanks for examples, But I notice one odd thing on the EX-RCs you compare MI2040==1. Isn't it you wait for sending until network is busy ? Anatoly
-
-
Blog Entries
-
