> Fabios, the previous posts were deleted because they contained a wrong approach, according to you.
Ok, no problem.
>I know you asked for a software solution, but it looks like the sensor is pointing to the nuts on the outside, and there are 8 of them. >This should help accuracy?
Ziwi, you are right. If i use 8 bolts i have more precision:
10(pulse in one second)*60(sec)/8(bolts)*2,34(ratio 433/1011) = 175,5 rpm
one pulse more:
11(pulse in one second)*60(sec)/8(bolts)*2,34(ratio 433/1011) = 193,05 rpm
It's no the best but it's better. There is only one problem.....it's no possible!
Damian your solution i like it! I study it and test! If i need help i will contact you, according to you!
Regards
Fabio