Simon

Lockdown machine? Poor social distancing at the end though 😁

Thanks Aus 🙂 i think I'm getting more done during lockdown, in some areas at least.

Hi Khom, It looks like you are treating th e relay output as if it were an input. Try linking I0 (Input Zero) to the contact, and wire the inputs on the module accordingly. I 0 MB 24 ---| |------( )-

I'd turn attention to the message format. You have a message length of 20 characters in the protocol scan, but the message is only 3 characters, including the CR (0D hex). Reduce your message template to 3 characters and you should see something better. In terms of decoding, you have at least 3 options: 1. Read the raw message then use logic to pull out the 2nd character as the data. As Aus suggests, you can use the "P" and "R" messages as a redundancy measure. Set the steam variable to put one character per integer. that way the second integer in the vector will hold the ascii value of the key that was pressed. 2. Create a variation of the template where the first and last characters are fixed text, and the centre character is linked to an MI. You would need two templates, one for the "P" messages and one for the "R" messages. 3. Do the "brute force" method and create 24 individual messages and use the "Index of received message" to tell you which key was pressed or released. Example below for the digits 0...3

What is showing on the screen of the HMI? I suggest you contact your local distributor, and Unitronics support.

Try unplug/re-plug the USB. Also try cycling power to the PLC. Just while you are working with getting started, i would also try any example that is already written for the 570. I see you have a V120 example opened.

Try setting the baud rate to 115,200. That is the default value for the V570.

Have you tested comms after installing the driver? I know those windows messages look concerning, but I'd just check and see if it's working. Also try unplug/re-plug the USB and/or a restart of the PC To check the comms: Go back to the Connection -> Communication and OS dialog. Select COM3, click Get OPLC Information

Hi Tim, Good to have Unitronics confirm that. I suspected it was the case but have never tried it. Simon

Hi Tim, Good to have Unitronics confirm that. I suspected it was the case but have never tried it. Simon

No worries, your post came before Tim posted about the masters both being PC-based.

I would definitely try a test setup with two ModbusTCP masters polling the single UniStream slave. As I said it may just work exactly the way the V230 has been working. If you don't have the actual masters, then test with a PC based emulator. I took a quick look and see what you mean about setting up two Modbus configs and two Scan EX blocks in Visilogic. Easy to do. If you used UniCAN you would need CAN modules on all PLCs. But you say you are using a windows PC as the master, so I don't think CAN is the right option. It's frustrating that a newer version doesn't do what the old one did. If you want to push it further with Unitronics, then yes I would open a support ticket. Hope this helps, Simon

Hi Tim, Unilogic doesn't support 2 slaves on the same protocol. Since it's ethernet you may find that the two masters can connect and each poll the same slave without issue, this would depend on how rapidly the masters were each polling the slave. This would definitely be a problem on RS485, but Ethernet can handle some level of simultaneous requests. I suspect if both masters made a poll request at the same time, one of them would be buffered until the other one was answered, then the buffered request would be answered. I understand if you want a more tightly engineered solution, and for that you would need to add something external like the Moxa Mgate product that can allow multiple masters to access a single slave.

Yes, that's it 🙂

It is possible in any way to download log files via the Unistream built-in webpages? Firstly I see that the file browser widget is not yet supported in the web page editor. However is there another way to embed a log file into a hyperlink on the screen, so the user can just click on the link to download the file into their browser? The specific application is energy monitoring and logging, and many self-contained off-the-shelf systems have this type of interface. They often run on Javascript engines or similar. Thanks, Simon

Yes, it is unclear what you are trying to do. As @Flex727 has said, there is a Toggle Coil which could be used with your Timer as below. User has to hold the button for the length of the timer to turn on or turn off.

Hi Mel, I can't see a system function for this, but each HMI screen has the optional "Is Active" tag (bit type). Are you looking for a way to monitor an existing project, or creating from scratch? Obviously this requires a program change if you are working with an existing project. Simon

Hi, these are just my quick comments, but one key thing with autotune and heaters is to choose the right setpoint. The autotune can get "stuck" or just take a really long time if the wrong setpoint is used. Autotune drives the process to the setpoint, then applied alternative step changes to the setpoint, about 5-10% above and below the setpoint. It measures the step response of the process to these changes in setpoint. For example, if your ambient temp is 23° C and you choose a setpoint of 30°C the process will ramp up nicely to 30° (or 33°). However for the negative ramp (back to 27°) it will take a very long time, especially if the process vessel is large and/or insulated, as the difference between the process temp and ambient temp is very small. On the other hand, if the process temp is 90°C and the vessel is relatively small and uninsulated, the autotune will cycle much faster, as the vessel is able to lose heat quickly once the heater is tuned off. Hope this makes sense, it seemed like a complete mystery to me until I worked through it. My desktop test system is a 5W ceramic resistor inside a plastic cup 🙂

Thanks, glad it was helpful.

Hi, It's all about the reference point. First let me say, with the outputs, the diagram you post is consistent with how i've summarised it. Regarding the inputs, the diagram you post is showing everything relative to the PLC, which is opposite to how I have summarised it. So for the PNP input, the external device (sensor, switch) is sourcing, and the PLC input is sinking (current flows from the external device into the PLC input) for the NPN input, the external device is sinking, and the PLC input is sourcing. (current flows from the PLC input into the external device) so the trick is to understand whether the source/sink terminology refers to the external input device or the PLC input. In my explanation, I have used the external device as the reference point. There are many ways to represent this, but the physics is consistent 🙂

Hi, I think you have the sensor side back to front. Below are two diagrams from 2 brands of sensors. The PNP sensor is connected between +24V and the PLC input (load) and the NPN sensor is connected between 0V and the PLC input. It's the opposite for outputs. The terms Sinking and Sourcing often get used, and that can also be confusing without the right reference point. It's better to think in terms of current flow rather than voltage. The sinking and sourcing of current is relative to the signal driver. And for the purists, we are talking conventional current not electron flow 🙂 Sourcing - the signal driver is pushing current * sourcing input - the driver (sensor) pushes current into the load (PLC input) * sourcing output - the driver (PLC output) pushes current into the load (solenoid, relay, etc) Sinking - the signal driver is receiving current * sinking input - the driver (sensor) receives current from the load (PLC input) * sinking output - the driver (PLC output) receives current from the load (solenoid, relay, etc) I hope that's helpful, I don't claim to have the only way, or the best way, of explaining this.

Hi Louis, Glad the firmware update solved it. Simon

👍

Hi Mark, Welcome 🙂 Try pulsing SB31 after updating the vector of MIs. Make sure it's a one-shot pulse, not a direct condition. Simon

Ha Ha, love the image 🙂