Jump to content

olivier

Members
  • Posts

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by olivier

  1. hi,

    i use the transpose function with a float. when i transpose 560.8 i got 3530 / 3036/372E but i should have 382E for the last value...

    Is there a way to correct this?

    i use a V350 with (i think) the last OS (3.6 (14))

    here is a screenshot of what i got...

    another things an option in the transpose tool where we can choose to got 3035/3630 ... instead of 3530 / 3036... would be great...

    Thank you...

    post-185-0-67968900-1360602074_thumb.jpg

  2. hi,

    it's been a long time that this "problem" bothers me.

    In protocol scan when i insert a control char for example 84 (hex) 84 appears in white with background red. When i push Ok to the protocol scan windows it close and when i reopen it the 84 appears like an unknown ASCII char with a I

    Is there a way to let the Hex value of the control char visible when we open the windows again.

    Thanks

    Best regards

  3. Hi,

    How can I reactivate a Keypad entry on a JAZZ?

    I explain :

    - when i boot the entry is valid so i can modify my value.

    - then i validate with enter.

    Now my entry isn't enable anymore.

    How can i enable the entry without rebooting or changing screen ?

    I can't find the right SB to allow that....

    Thanks

  4. hi,

    i got a subroutine call when MB 0 is on. In this subroutine i want to catch a falling edge of MB1.

    if i set MB 0 then i set MB1. Then i reset MB 0

    the subroutine isn't call anymore. I now reset MB1.

    When i set MB0 again i call the subroutine and then the falling edge is "activate". Is this a normal behaviour?

    i first thought that the rise and fall edge where decided at the start of the scan cycle? but it seems it is net dependent !

    It's maybe an rfc something rule but i am not aware enough of those rules. I just wnat a confirmation it's a normal thing and not a bug...

    Thanks

  5. Changing SI100 didn't improve the result.

    I made a test that is quite interesting.

    I change my protocol scan and i remove the two ETX byte (0D & 0A) and i set an end of frame with a 40 ms silence.

    I didn't get a session complete flag and still get -1 in MI 1002.

    But in the info mode i can monitor the frame like i am waiting.

    i think it can help. no?

    i continue my tests

    best regards

    Olivier

  6. i have ever done that. This function is very useful anyway...

    it's sure i didn't receive what i expect via the "monitor" it seems i receive 5 byte ( the counter inc of 5 in the monitor) and these byte aren't showed in one time in the monitor. I just see the last byte. ( just a note the ability to get back the "old" data receive would be a great feature for debuging...a kind of buffer we can navigate thru)

    The problem is that with the V120 to weighing system send me the good answer to the S command. And that without any reboot of any kind.

    i really can't see the problem.

    the strange thing is that the weighing sys should send me a frame and i see in the monitor as if there was multiple frame.

    Thanks for your help...

  7. hi,

    i am trying to communicate with a weighing system.

    i first made a sample project with a V120 everything was working great. I am now coding this into a V350. I first copy the routine use in the V120 (copy and paste cause convert project didn't work) and the code in the V350 didn't work.

    Then i try to add manually each instruction "from scratch" it don't work better.

    I can't find where is the problem.

    My two com port are working for downloading purpose (visilogic) The only way i am investigate is that i got an error 1 in the MI status of the protocol config.And that only in the V350.

    here is the 2 code.

    Thanks for any help.

    essai com v120 light.vlp

    essai com V350.vlp

  8. Hi,

    what is the best way with the PID FB (auto tuned) to implement a regulation with "heat and cold" i mean with two physical output one to made the measure grow the other that helps the measure to decrease ?

    For now i set the CV low to -1000 and the CV high to +1000 and done some code to activate each output via two PWM FB ... Is it the right way? is thre another better method?

    Thank you

    Olivier

×
×
  • Create New...