Isakovic Posted July 8, 2020 Report Share Posted July 8, 2020 When doing system upgrade for Vision PLC, there is a message while OS is being installed: For System Upgrade PC should be connected to PLC via COM 1 Should be, or has to be? OS can also be upgraded vie Ethernet, so why is it recommended to be done over serial port? Why is this note there? Is it technical reason or practical, like if something goes wrong PLC will be in your reach and you won't have bricked unit in remote location. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVP 2023 Flex727 Posted July 8, 2020 MVP 2023 Report Share Posted July 8, 2020 I've wondered that, too. I've upgraded the firmware many times by Ethernet and never had an issue. Are they worried that the firmware upgrade might wipe out the Ethernet IP settings, thus causing an interruption in the process? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVP 2023 Ausman Posted July 8, 2020 MVP 2023 Report Share Posted July 8, 2020 I've had units totally fall over doing it by ethernet, and have had to do lots of travel to fix as the only method was serial. That said, I mainly use 130s, which shouldn't affect this but perhaps does. I remember whingeing about this on the forum once, but couldn't find it with a quick look. Wanted a big red warning to come up saying don't do it!! Haven't been game to try since. All updates now done when on site. cheers, Aus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVP 2023 Ausman Posted July 8, 2020 MVP 2023 Report Share Posted July 8, 2020 And a PS to the above, I have a 130 that needs doing so I'll try using Ethernet (via external connections) when I'm next on site, not due for a few months yet, though. cheers, Aus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isakovic Posted July 9, 2020 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2020 17 hours ago, Ausman said: I remember whingeing about this on the forum once This could have inspired that Note. I remember reading an old topic about user objecting that timers which have unused contacts should generate warning message after compiling, now timers with unused contacts do generate warning after compiling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now